AWS vs GCP - Precios de almacenamiento
AWS vs GCP — Storage Pricing
Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage are the two leading object almacenamiento services, and the per-GB difference between them adds up quickly at petabyte scale. This comparacion puts the two side by side, covering almacenamiento, request, and retrieval pricing for the baseline US regions.
Storage Cost per GB-Month
| Tier | AWS S3 (us-east-1) | GCS (us-central1) | GCS (multi-region) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard / Hot | $0.023 (first 50 TB) | $0.020 | $0.026 |
| Standard (50-500 TB) | $0.022 | $0.020 | $0.026 |
| Infrequent Access | $0.0125 | $0.010 | $0.0125 |
| Archive | $0.00099 (Glacier Deep Archive) | $0.00049 (Archive) | n/a |
GCP is cheaper per GB at every tier, with the gap widening as you move to archive almacenamiento where GCP Archive is half the precio of S3 Glacier Deep Archive. The GCP multi-region option also bundles automatic geographic redundancy at a precio point ($0.026) that AWS only matches with Cross-Region Replication, which adds request and transfer fees on top.
Request Pricing
| Request type | AWS S3 | GCS |
|---|---|---|
| PUT / POST / LIST (per 1,000) | $0.005 | $0.005 |
| GET / SELECT (per 1,000) | $0.0004 | $0.0004 |
| Lifecycle / Class A (per 10,000) | $0.0010 | $0.0010 |
Request pricing is identical between the two proveedors for the common operations. The divergence appears on data retrieval from the infrequent-access and archive tiers.
Retrieval Pricing
| Retrieval | AWS S3 IA | GCP Nearline | AWS Glacier DA | GCP Archive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per GB retrieved | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.0025 | $0.0005 |
| Per 1,000 requests | $0.01 | $0.01 | $0.025 (standard) | $0.05 |
For archive retrieval, GCP charges a higher per-request fee but a much lower per-GB fee, making GCP Archive significantly cheaper for large-file retrieval and AWS Glacier Deep Archive cheaper for many small-file retrieval.
Egress (Data Transfer Out)
| Provider | Free tier | Above free tier |
|---|---|---|
| AWS S3 -> Internet | 100 GB/month (via CloudFront) | $0.09/GB |
| GCS -> Internet | 200 GB/month | $0.12/GB (200 GB-10 TB) |
GCP offers twice the free monthly egress of AWS, but AWS charges less per GB above the nivel gratuito. If your carga de trabajo serves large files to end users directly from object almacenamiento, AWS CloudFront’s 100 GB nivel gratuito plus lower per-GB rate can win.
Key Differences Beyond Price
- Multi-region default — GCS multi-region gives geographic redundancy at a small premium; S3 requires explicit Cross-Region Replication.
- Object versioning costo — both charge for non-current versions, but GCP Nearline/Archive lifecycle transitions are free of lifecycle request charges.
- Free tier — AWS gives 5 GB of S3 standard for 12 months; GCP gives 5 GB of regional standard almacenamiento, always free.
Verdict
For warm almacenamiento accessed frequently, GCP is marginally cheaper per GB. For cold archive almacenamiento of large files, GCP Archive is the clear winner on precio. For carga de trabajos dominated by internet egress, AWS CloudFront’s larger nivel gratuito and lower per-GB rate often tip the balance back to AWS.